Storage and Assignment of Control Timing Configurations in a Multiple Cell Communications Network

ABSTRACT

Example embodiments are directed towards a network node, and corresponding method, for a configuration of scheduling or control timing for a user equipment in a multiple cell communications network. The configuration of scheduling or control timing being based on at least two ordered sets of timing configuration numbers, each ordered set corresponding to a cell associated with the user equipment in the multiple cell communications network.

TECHNICAL FIELD

Example embodiments are directed towards a network node, and corresponding method, for a configuration of scheduling or control timing for a user equipment in a multiple cell communications network.

BACKGROUND Long Term Evolution Systems

Long Term Evolution (LTE) uses Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) in the downlink direction and a Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT)-spread OFDM in the uplink direction. The basic LTE downlink physical resource may thus be seen as a time-frequency grid as illustrated in FIG. 1, where each resource element corresponds to one OFDM subcarrier during one OFDM symbol interval. In the time domain, LTE downlink transmissions may be organized into radio frames of 10 ms, with each radio frame consisting of ten equally-sized subframes of length T subframe=1 ms, as illustrated in FIG. 2.

Furthermore, the resource allocation in LTE is typically described in terms of resource blocks, where a resource block corresponds to one slot (0.5 ms) in the time domain and 12 subcarriers in the frequency domain. Resource blocks are numbered in the frequency domain, starting with 0 from one end of the system bandwidth.

Downlink transmissions are dynamically scheduled, i.e., in each subframe the base station transmits control information about to which user equipments data is transmitted and upon which resource blocks the data is transmitted, in the current downlink subframe. This control signaling is typically transmitted in the first 1, 2, 3 or 4 OFDM symbols in each subframe. A downlink system with 3 OFDM symbols for control purposes is illustrated in FIG. 3. The dynamic scheduling information is communicated to the user equipments via a Physical Downlink Control Channel (PDCCH) transmitted in the control region. After successful decoding of a PDCCH, the user equipment shall perform reception of the Physical Downlink Shared Channel (PDSCH) or transmission of the Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) according to pre-determined timing specified in the LTE specifications.

LTE uses a Hybrid-Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ), where, after receiving downlink data in a subframe, the user equipment attempts to decode it and reports to the base station whether the decoding was successful, sending an Acknowledge (ACK), or not, sending a Non-Acknowledgement (NACK) via the Physical Uplink Control CHannel (PUCCH). In case of an unsuccessful decoding attempt, the base station may retransmit the erroneous data. Similarly, the base station may indicate to the UE whether the decoding of the PUSCH was successful, sending an ACK, or not, sending a NACK, via the Physical Hybrid ARQ Indicator CHannel (PHICH).

Uplink control signaling from the user equipment to the base station may comprise (1) HARQ acknowledgements for received downlink data; (2) user equipment reports related to the downlink channel conditions, used as assistance for the downlink scheduling; and/or (3) scheduling requests, indicating that a mobile user equipment needs uplink resources for uplink data transmissions.

If the mobile user equipment has not been assigned an uplink resource for data transmission, the L1/L2 control information, such as channel-status reports, HARQ acknowledgments, and scheduling requests, is transmitted in uplink resources e.g. in resource blocks, specifically assigned for uplink L1/L2 control on Release 8 (Rel-8) PUCCH. As illustrated in FIG. 4, these uplink resources are located at the edges of the total available transmission bandwidth. Each such uplink resource comprises 12 “subcarriers” (one resource block) within each of the two slots of an uplink subframe. In order to provide frequency diversity, these frequency resources are frequency hopping, indicated by the arrow, on the slot boundary, i.e. one “resource” comprises 12 subcarriers at the upper part of the spectrum within the first slot of a subframe and an equally sized resource at the lower part of the spectrum during the second slot of the subframe or vice versa. If more resources are needed for the uplink L1/L2 control signaling, e.g. in case of very large overall transmission bandwidth supporting a large number of users, additional resources blocks may be assigned next to the previously assigned resource blocks.

Carrier Aggregation

The LTE Release 10 (Rel-10) standard has recently been standardized, supporting bandwidths larger than 20 MHz. One requirement on LTE Rel-10 is to assure backward compatibility with LTE Rel-8. This may also include spectrum compatibility. That would imply that an LTE Rel-10 carrier, wider than 20 MHz, should appear as a number of LTE carriers to an LTE Rel-8 user equipment. Each such carrier may be referred to as a Component Carrier (CC). In particular for early LTE Rel-10 deployments it may be expected that there will be a smaller number of LTE Rel-10-capable user equipments compared to many LTE legacy user equipments. Therefore, it may be useful to assure an efficient use of a wide carrier also for legacy user equipments, i.e. that it is possible to implement carriers where legacy user equipments may be scheduled in all parts of the wideband LTE Rel-10 carrier. The straightforward way to obtain this would be by means of Carrier Aggregation (CA). CA implies that an LTE Rel-10 user equipment may receive multiple CCs, where the CCs have, or at least the possibility to have, the same structure as a Rel-8 carrier. CA is illustrated in FIG. 5.

The number of aggregated CCs as well as the bandwidth of the individual CCs may be different for uplink and downlink. A symmetric configuration refers to the case where the number of CCs in downlink and uplink is the same whereas an asymmetric configuration refers to the case that the number of CCs is different. It should be noted that the number of CCs configured in a cell may be different from the number of CCs seen by a user equipment. A user equipment may for example support more downlink CCs than uplink CCs, even though the network is configured with the same number of uplink and downlink CCs.

During an initial access, an LTE Rel-10 user equipment behaves similarly to a LTE Rel-8 user equipment. Upon successful connection to the network a user equipment may—depending on its own capabilities and the network—be configured with additional CCs for uplink and downlink. Configuration is based on the Radio Resource Control (RRC). Due to the heavy signaling and rather slow speed of RRC signaling it is envisioned that a user equipment may be configured with multiple CCs even though not all of them are currently used. If a user equipment is configured on multiple CCs this would imply it has to monitor all downlink CCs for PDCCH and PDSCH. This implies a wider receiver bandwidth, higher sampling rates, etc., resulting in high power consumption.

To mitigate the above described problems, LTE Rel-10 supports activation of CCs on top of configuration. The user equipment monitors only configured and activated CCs for PDCCH and PDSCH. Since activation is based on Medium Access Control (MAC) control elements, which are faster than RRC signaling, activation/de-activation may follow the number of CCs that are required to fulfill the current data rate needs. Upon arrival of large data amounts multiple CCs are activated, used for data transmission, and de-activated if not needed anymore. All but one CC, the Downlink (DL) Primary CC (DL PCC), may be de-activated. Therefore, activation provides the possibility to configure multiple CC but only activate them on a need-to basis. Most of the time a user equipment would have one or very few CCs activated resulting in a lower reception bandwidth and thus battery consumption.

Scheduling of a CC may be done on the PDCCH via downlink assignments. Control information on the PDCCH may be formatted as a Downlink Control Information (DCI) message. In Rel-8 a user equipment may only operate with one downlink and one uplink CC. The association between downlink assignment, uplink grants and the corresponding downlink and uplink CCs is therefore clear. In Rel-10 two modes of CA should be distinguished. A first mode is very similar to the operation of multiple Rel-8 CC, a downlink assignment or uplink grant contained in a DCI message transmitted on a CC is either valid for the downlink CC itself or for associated (either via cell-specific or user equipment specific linking) uplink CC. A second mode of operation augments a DCI message with the Carrier Indicator Field (CIF). A DCI comprising a downlink assignment with CIF is valid for that downlink CC indicted with CIF and a DCI comprising an uplink grant with CIF is valid for the indicated uplink CC.

DCI messages for downlink assignments comprise among others resource block assignment, modulation and coding scheme related parameters, HARQ redundancy version, etc. In addition to those parameters that relate to the actual downlink transmission, most DCI formats for downlink assignments also comprise a bit field for Transmit Power Control (TPC) commands. These TPC commands are used to control the uplink power control behavior of the corresponding PUCCH that is used to transmit the HARQ feedback.

In Rel-10 LTE, the transmission of PUCCH is mapped onto one specific uplink CC, the Uplink (UL) Primary CC (UL PCC). User equipments configured with a single downlink CC (which is then the DL PCC) and uplink CC (which is then the UL PCC) are operating dynamic ACK/NACK on PUCCH according to Rel-8. The first Control Channel Element (CCE) used to transmit PDCCH for the downlink assignment determines the dynamic ACK/NACK resource on Rel-8 PUCCH. Since only one downlink CC is cell-specifically linked with the UL PCC, no PUCCH collisions may occur since all PDCCH are transmitted using different first CCE.

Upon reception of downlink assignments on a single Secondary CC (SCC) or reception of multiple DL assignments, CA PUCCH should be used. A downlink SCC assignment alone is untypical. The scheduler in the base station should strive to schedule a single downlink CC assignment on the DL PCC and try to de-activate SCCs if not needed. A possible scenario that may occur is that the base station schedules user equipment on multiple downlink CCs including the PCC. If the user equipment misses all but the DL PCC assignment it will use Rel-8 PUCCH instead of CA PUCCH. To detect this error case the base station has to monitor both the Rel-8 PUCCH and the CA PUCCH.

In Rel-10 LTE, the CA PUCCH format is based on the number of configured CCs. Configuration of CCs is based on RRC signaling. After successful reception/application of the new configuration a confirmation message is sent back making RRC signaling very safe.

Time Division Duplex

Transmission and reception from a node, e.g. user equipment in a cellular system such as LTE, may be multiplexed in the frequency domain or in the time domain (or combinations thereof). Frequency Division Duplex (FDD) as illustrated to the left in FIG. 6 implies that downlink and uplink transmissions take place in different, sufficiently separated, frequency bands. Time Division Duplex (TDD), as illustrated to the right in FIG. 6, implies that downlink and uplink transmissions take place in different, non-overlapping time slots. Thus, TDD may operate in unpaired spectrum, whereas FDD requires paired spectrum.

Typically, the structure of the transmitted signal in a communication system is organized in the form of a frame structure. For example, LTE uses ten equally-sized subframes of length 1 ms per radio frame as illustrated in FIG. 7.

In the case of FDD operation (upper part of FIG. 7), there are two carrier frequencies, one for uplink transmission (f_(UL)) and one for downlink transmission (f_(DL)). At least with respect to the user equipment in a cellular communication system, FDD may be either full duplex or half duplex. In the full duplex case, a user equipment may transmit and receive simultaneously, while in half-duplex operation, the user equipment cannot transmit and receive simultaneously (the base station is capable of simultaneous reception/transmission though, e.g. receiving from one user equipment while simultaneously transmitting to another user equipment). In LTE, a half-duplex user equipment is monitoring/receiving in the downlink except when explicitly being instructed to transmit in a certain subframe.

In the case of TDD operation (lower part of FIG. 7), there may be only a single carrier frequency and uplink and downlink transmissions are typically separated in time on a cell basis. As the same carrier frequency is used for uplink and downlink transmission, both the base station and the mobile user equipments need to switch from transmission to reception and vice versa. An aspect of any TDD system is to provide the possibility for a sufficiently large guard time where neither downlink nor uplink transmissions occur. This is required to avoid interference between uplink and downlink transmissions. For LTE, this guard time is provided by special subframes (subframe 1 and, in some cases, subframe 6), which are split into three parts: a downlink part, a Downlink Pilot Time Slot (DwPTS), a guard period (GP), and an uplink part, an Uplink Pilot Time Slot (UpPTS). The remaining subframes are either allocated to uplink or downlink transmission.

SUMMARY

An object of some of the example embodiments presented herein is to provide an efficient means of assigning uplink-downlink configurations across all aggregated CCs. Accordingly, some of the example embodiments may be directed towards a method, in a base station, for configuring control timing to and from a user equipment in a multiple cell communications network. The method comprises determining at least one timing configuration number for a plurality of aggregated cells of the multiple cell communications network. Each aggregated cell is associated with an uplink-downlink configuration number, where at least two uplink-downlink configuration numbers of the plurality of aggregated cells are not equal. The plurality of aggregated cells is associated with the user equipment. The method also comprises assigning the at least one timing configuration number to the user equipment.

Some of the example embodiments may be directed towards a base station for configuring control timing to and from a user equipment in a multiple cell communications network. The base station comprises a determination unit configured to determine at least one timing configuration number for a plurality of aggregated cells of the multiple cell communications network. Each aggregated cell is associated with an uplink-downlink configuration number. At least two uplink-downlink configuration numbers of the plurality of aggregated cells are not equal. The plurality of aggregated cells is associated with the user equipment. The base station also comprises an assignment unit configured to assign the at least one timing configuration number to the user equipment.

Some of the example embodiments may be directed towards a method, in a user equipment, for a configuration of control timing for a user equipment in a multiple cell communications network. The method comprises receiving, from a base station, at least one timing configuration number for a plurality of aggregated cells of the multiple cell communications network. Each aggregated cell is associated with an uplink-downlink configuration number, and where at least two uplink-downlink configuration numbers of the plurality of aggregated cells are not equal. The plurality of aggregated cells is associated with the user equipment. The method also comprises implementing control timing based on the at least one timing configuration number.

Some of the example embodiments may be directed towards a user equipment, for a configuration of control timing for a user equipment in a multiple cell communications network. The user equipment comprises a determining unit configured to receive, from a base station, at least one timing configuration number for a plurality of aggregated cells of the multiple cell communications network, where each aggregated cell is associated with an uplink-downlink configuration number, and where at least two uplink-downlink configuration numbers of the plurality of aggregated cells are not equal. The plurality of aggregated cells is associated with the user equipment. The user equipment also comprises an implementation unit configured to implement control timing based on the at least one timing configuration number.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing will be apparent from the following more particular description of the example embodiments, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the example embodiments.

FIG. 1 is an illustrative example of a LTE downlink physical resource;

FIG. 2 is a schematic of a LTE time-domain structure;

FIG. 3 is an illustration of a downlink subframe;

FIG. 4 is an illustrative example of an uplink L1/L2 control signalling transmission on Rel-8 PUCCH;

FIG. 5 is an illustrative example of carrier aggregation;

FIG. 6 is an illustrative example of frequency and time-division duplex;

FIG. 7 is a schematic of an uplink-downlink time/frequency structure for LTE for the case of FDD and TDD;

FIG. 8 is a schematic of different downlink/uplink configurations for the case of TDD;

FIG. 9 is an illustrative example of uplink-downlink interference in TDD;

FIG. 10 is an illustration of PDSCH A/N feedback timings for a configuration 1 cell and a configuration 2 cell;

FIG. 11 is an illustration of PUSCH grant and A/N feedback timings for a configuration 1 cell and a configuration 2 cell;

FIG. 12 is an illustration of PDSCH A/N feedback timings for a configuration 1 cell and a configuration 3 cell;

FIG. 13 is an illustration of PUSCH grant and A/N feedback timings for a configuration 1 cell and a configuration 3 cell;

FIG. 14 is an illustrative example of carrier aggregation of TDD cells with different uplink-downlink configurations;

FIG. 15 is an illustrative example of subframe compatibility hierarchy, according to some of the example embodiments;

FIG. 16 is an illustration of PUSCH grant and A/N feedback timings for aggregation of a configuration 1 cell as Pcell and a configuration 2 cell as Scell, according to some of the example embodiments;

FIG. 17 is an illustration of PUSCH grant and A/N feedback timings for aggregation of a configuration 2 cell as Pcell and a configuration 1 cell as Scell, according to some of the example embodiments;

FIG. 18 is an illustration of PDSCH A/N feedback timings for aggregation of a configuration 1 cell and a configuration 2 cell, according to some of the example embodiments;

FIG. 19 is an illustration of PUSCH grant and A/N feedback timings for aggregation of a configuration 1 cell as Pcell and a configuration 3 cell as Scell, according to some of the example embodiments;

FIG. 20 is an illustration of PUSCH grant and A/N feedback timings for aggregation of a configuration 3 cell as Pcell and a configuration 1 cell as Scell, according to some of the example embodiments;

FIG. 21 is an illustration of PDSCH A/N feedback timings for aggregation of a configuration 1 cell and a configuration 3 cell, according to some of the example embodiments;

FIG. 22 is an illustrative example of the timing of additional forward-subframe DL scheduling PDCCHs in support of half-duplex UEs with aggregation of a configuration 1 cell and a configuration 2 cell, according to some of the example embodiments;

FIG. 23 is an illustrative example of the timing of additional forward-subframe DL scheduling PDCCHs in support of half-duplex UEs with aggregation of a configuration 1 cell and a configuration 3 cell, according to some of the example embodiments;

FIG. 24 is an illustrative example of the timing of additional cross-carrier forward-subframe DL scheduling PDCCHs in support of full-duplex UEs with aggregation of a configuration 1 cell as Pcell and a configuration 2 cell as Scell, according to some of the example embodiments;

FIG. 25 is an illustrative example of the timing of additional cross-carrier forward-subframe DL scheduling PDCCHs in support of full-duplex UEs with aggregation of a configuration 1 cell and a configuration 3 cell, according to some of the example embodiments;

FIG. 26 is a schematic of a network node configured to perform the example embodiments described herein;

FIG. 27 is a flow diagram depicting example operations of the network node of FIG. 26.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following description, for purposes of explanation and not limitation, specific details are set forth, such as particular components, elements, techniques, etc. in order to provide a thorough understanding of the example embodiments. However, the example embodiments may be practiced in other manners that depart from these specific details. In other instances, detailed descriptions of well-known methods and elements are omitted so as not to obscure the description of the example embodiments.

As part of the development of the example embodiments presented herein, a problem will first be identified and discussed. TDD allows for different asymmetries in terms of the amount of resources allocated for uplink and downlink transmission, respectively, by means of different downlink/uplink configurations. In LTE, there are seven different configurations as shown in FIG. 8. Note that in the description below, under the heading ‘TDD HARQ Timing’, a downlink subframe may mean either downlink or the special subframe.

To avoid severe interference between downlink and uplink transmissions between different cells, neighbor cells should have the same downlink/uplink configuration. If this is not done, uplink transmission in one cell may interfere with downlink transmission in the neighboring cell and vice versa as illustrated in FIG. 9. Hence, the downlink/uplink asymmetry may typically not vary between cells, but is signaled as part of the system information and remains fixed for a long period of time.

The description provided herein is arranged as follows. First, an overview of current systems and methods for control timing configuration is presented under the heading ‘Existing Systems—TDD HARQ Control Timing’. Thereafter, limitations of the existing systems are explored under the subheading ‘Problems with Existing Solutions’.

A basis for the example embodiments is thereafter presented in the section entitled ‘Subframe Timing Compatibility’, where complex configuration tables (explained in ‘Existing Systems—TDD HARQ Control Timing’) may be replaced with the use of a subframe timing compatibility hierarchy. Thereafter, examples of control timing configuration assignment, utilizing the subframe timing compatibility hierarchy, are provided in the sub-section entitled ‘Configuration Assignment’. Examples of control timing configuration assignment based on an ordered listing of the subframe timing compatibility hierarchy is provided in the sub-section ‘Computation of the Subframe Timing Compatibility based on Efficient Storage.’

Thereafter, examples of control timing configuration assignment of user equipments utilizing a half-duplex mode of operation are provided in the sub-section ‘Examples of Half-Duplex Configuration Assignment’. Similarly, examples of control timing configuration assignment of user equipments utilizing a full-duplex mode of operation are provided in the sub-section ‘Examples of Full-Duplex Configuration Assignment’. Thereafter examples of forward downlink scheduling with respect to user equipments with full and half-duplex modes of operation is provided under the sub-heading ‘Examples of Forward Downlink Scheduling’.

Finally, examples of network node configurations and example operations of such nodes are presented under the sub-headings ‘Example Node Configurations’ and ‘Example Node Operations’. It should be appreciated that the example node operations provide a generalized explanation of node operations which may encompass all of the examples provided in the foregoing sub-headings which are not related to existing systems.

Existing Systems—TDD HARQ Control Timing

The timings for HARQ ACK/NACK (A/N) feedbacks for the PUSCH and the PDSCH as well as the grant of PUSCH may be specified with extensive tables and procedure descriptions for each uplink-downlink configuration.

For TDD UL/DL (U/D) configurations 1-6 and normal HARQ operation, the user equipment shall upon detection of a PDCCH with an uplink DCI format and/or a PHICH transmission in subframe n intended for the user equipment, adjust the corresponding PUSCH transmission in subframe n+k, with k given in Table 1, shown below, according to the PDCCH and PHICH information.

TABLE 1 PUSCH grant timing k for TDD configurations 0-6 TDD U/D subframe number n Configuration 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 4 6 4 6 1 6 4 6 4 2 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 6 7 7 7 7 5

For TDD U/D configuration 0 and normal HARQ operation the user equipment shall upon detection of a PDCCH with uplink DCI format and/or a PHICH transmission in subframe n intended for the user equipment, adjust the corresponding PUSCH transmission in subframe n+k if the Most Significant Bit (MSB) of the UL index in the PDCCH with uplink DCI format is set to 1 or PHICH is received in subframe n=0 or 5 in the resource corresponding to I_(PHICH)=0, with k given in Table 1. If, for TDD U/D configuration 0 and normal HARQ operation, the Least Significant Bit (LSB) of the UL index in the DCI format 0/4 is set to 1 in subframe n or a PHICH is received in subframe n=0 or 5 in the resource corresponding to I_(PHICH)=1, or PHICH is received in subframe n=1 or 6, the user equipment shall adjust the corresponding PUSCH transmission in subframe n+7. If, for TDD U/D configuration 0, both the MSB and LSB of the UL index in the PDCCH with uplink DCI format are sent in subframe n, the user equipment shall adjust the corresponding PUSCH transmission in both subframes n+k and n+7, with k given in Table 1.

For PUSCH transmissions scheduled from a serving cell c in subframe n, a user equipment shall determine the corresponding PHICH resource of serving cell c in subframe n+k_(PHICH), where k_(PHICH) is given in Table 2, provided below, for TDD. For subframe bundling operation, the corresponding PHICH resource is associated with the last subframe in the bundle.

TABLE 2 _(k) _(PHICH) for TDD TDD U/D subframe index n Configuration 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 4 7 6 4 7 6 1 4 6 4 6 2 6 6 3 6 6 6 4 6 6 5 6 6 4 6 6 4 7

The user equipment shall also feedback PDSCH decoding A/N information in pre-defined UL subframes. The user equipment shall transmit such a HARQ A/N response on the PUCCH in UL subframe, if there is PDSCH transmission indicated by the detection of corresponding PDCCH or there is PDCCH indicating downlink SPS release within subframe(s) n−k, where k is within the association set K={k₀, k₁, . . . k_(M−1)} listed in Table 3, provided below.

TABLE 3 Downlink association set index _(K): {k₀, k₁, . . . k_(M−1)} for TDD UL-DL Subframe n Configuration 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 6 4 6 4 1 7, 6 4 7, 6 4 2 8, 7, 4, 6 8, 7, 4, 6 3 7, 6, 11 6, 5 5, 4 4 12, 8, 7, 11 6, 5, 4, 7 5 13, 12, 9, 8, 7, 5, 4, 11, 6 6 7 7 5 7 7

In LTE Rel-10, all HARQ control timings are determined based on the Primary-cell (Pcell) configuration number as discussed above. The determination of HARQ operations in LTE Rel-10 work only if all aggregated TDD cells have an identical U/D configuration. However, when developing the example embodiments presented herein it has been discovered that a straightforward extension of this operation for aggregation of different U/D configurations proves difficult.

Consider the PDSCH A/N feedback timing example for aggregating a configuration 1 cell and a configuration 2 cell illustrated in FIG. 10. In FIG. 10, U represents uplink subframes, D represents downlink subframes, and S represents special subframes which may be used for both uplink and downlink. It should be appreciated that for the purpose of simplicity, the S subframes will be treated as downlink subframes in the examples provided herein.

If the configuration 2 cell is the Pcell, A/N feedback for the configuration 1 Secondary-cell (Scell) PDSCH may be fed-back based on the timing rules of Pcell. However, if the configuration 1 cell is the Pcell, there will be no A/N feedback timing rules for subframes 3 and 8 in the configuration 2 Scell.

Consider the PUSCH grant and A/N feedback timing example for aggregating a configuration 1 cell and a configuration 2 cell illustrated in FIG. 11. If the configuration 1 cell is the Pcell, PUSCH grant and A/N feedback for the configuration 2 Scell may be fed-back based on the timing rules of Pcell. However, if the configuration 2 cell is the Pcell, PUSCH cannot be scheduled for subframe 3 and 8 in configuration 1 Scell because there is no such UL grant timing in configuration 2. Note that A/N feedback timing rules for these two subframes are not available, either.

The control timing problems may be even more severe than the examples discussed above. In the case of aggregating a configuration 1 and a configuration 3 cells, the HARQ control timings don't work regardless of which configuration is the Pcell.

More specifically, consider the PDSCH A/N feedback timing illustrated in FIG. 12:

-   -   If configuration 1 is the Pcell, PDSCH A/N for subframes 7 & 8         of the configuration 3 Scell cannot be fed back.     -   If configuration 3 is the Pcell, PDSCH A/N for subframe 4 of the         configuration 1 Scell cannot be fed back.

Further, consider the PUSCH grant and A/N feedback timing illustrated in FIG. 13:

-   -   If configuration 1 is the Pcell, PUSCH for subframe 4 in         configuration 3 Scell cannot be scheduled.     -   If configuration 3 is the Pcell, PUSCH for subframe 7 & 8 in         configuration 1 Scell cannot be scheduled.         Problems with Existing Systems

The following are examples of some of the problems with existing solutions, which have been recognized when developing the embodiments presented herein. In Rel-10, carrier aggregation of TDD cells is specified with the restriction that the U/D configurations for all the aggregated cells are identical. There is a need to allow more flexible carrier aggregation of TDD cells is to be addressed in Rel-11 of LTE.

As discussed above, the U/D configurations of neighboring cells need to be compatible to avoid severe interference problems. However, there are cases where the neighboring cells are operated by different operators or different wireless systems. The LTE TDD cells adjacent to those neighboring systems are hence required to adopt certain compatible U/D configurations. As a result, an operator may have several TDD cells having different U/D configurations on different frequencies as illustrated in FIG. 14.

A further complication from such aggregation cases is that the nominally TDD user equipment may be required to transmit and receive simultaneously in certain subframes (such as subframe 7 and 8 in FIG. 14). Such FDD-like operations are incompatible with existing designs of TDD user equipments. To enable such full-duplex operations in Rel-11 may impose additional user equipment complexity and costs. It is therefore necessary to also consider possible half-duplex operations during such conflicting subframes. That is, the user equipment should be instructed to perform either reception or transmission but not both during such conflicting subframes.

To circumvent problems such those identified in the above, adding additional HARQ control timing rules based on specific aggregation cases may be performed. In additional to the existing timing rules for seven TDD configurations,

$\begin{pmatrix} 7 \\ 2 \end{pmatrix} = 21$

additional sets of rules may be added to specify the HARQ behaviors for every possible pair of heterogeneous configuration. On top of these, additional specification for aggregation of three different U/D configurations may also be introduced. Apparently, specifying these additional rules for supporting aggregation of different U/D configurations will substantially increase the LTE complexity and implementation costs.

Subframe Timing Compatibility

To enable a systematic solution to a plurality of aggregation scenarios with different TDD U/D configurations, according to some of the example embodiments, a subframe timing compatibility is designed and illustrated in FIG. 15. The subframe timing compatibility is a hierarchy that may be encoded as look-up tables, a linked list or a plurality of digital representations suitable for storage in communication devices.

The subframe timing compatibility hierarchy may be designed with the following principles:

(1) The UL subframes in a TDD configuration are also UL subframes in those TDD configurations that may be corrected with upward arrows.

For example, subframes 2 and 3 are UL subframes in configuration 4. These two subframes are also UL in configurations 3, 1, 6 and 0, all of which may be connected from configuration 4 with upward arrows. As a second example, subframes 2 and 7 are UL subframes in configuration 2. These two subframes are not both UL in configuration 3 because there is no upward arrow connecting the two configurations.

(2) The DL subframes in a TDD configuration are also DL subframes in those TDD configurations that may be corrected with downward arrows.

For example, subframe 0, 1, 5, 6 and 9 are DL subframes in configuration 6. These five subframes are also DL in configurations 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, all of which may be connected from configuration 6 with downward arrows. As a second example, subframe 7 is a DL subframe in configuration 3 but not a DL subframe in configuration 2 because there is no downward arrow connecting the two configurations.

With these design properties, the subframe timing compatibility hierarchy may provide the following utility:

(1) Given a set of TDD configurations to be aggregated, a TDD configuration that may be connected from all of the given TDD configurations with upward arrows has the following two properties:

-   -   The TDD configuration comprises UL subframes that are a superset         of all UL subframes from all given TDD configurations.     -   The TDD configuration comprises DL subframes that are available         in all given TDD configurations.

Example One

Given TDD configuration 1 and 2, all subframes that are UL in either configuration 1 or 2 are also UL subframes in configuration 1, 6 and 0. The DL subframes in configuration 1, 6 or 0 are also DL subframes in configuration 1 and 2.

Given TDD configuration 1 and 3, all subframes that are UL in either configuration 1 or 3 are also UL in configuration 6 and 0. The DL subframes in configuration 6 or 0 are also DL subframes in configuration 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.

Given TDD configuration 2, 3 and 4, all subframes that are UL in any of the three configurations are also UL in configuration 6 and 0. The DL subframes in configuration 6 or 0 are also DL subframes in configuration 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.

Given a set of TDD configurations, a TDD configuration that may be connected from all of the given TDD configurations with downward arrows has the following two properties:

-   -   The TDD configuration comprises DL subframes that are a superset         of all DL subframes from all given TDD configurations.     -   The TDD configuration comprises UL subframes that are available         in all given TDD configurations.

Example Two

Given TDD configuration 1 and 2, all subframes that are DL in either configuration 1 or 2 are also DL in configuration 2 and 5. The UL subframes in configuration 2 or 5 are also UL subframes in configuration 1, 2, 6 and 0.

Given TDD configuration 1 and 3, all subframes that are DL in either configuration 1 or 3 are also DL in configuration 4 and 5. The UL subframes in configuration 4 or 5 are also UL subframes in configuration 0, 3, 4 and 6.

Given TDD configuration 2, 3 and 4, all subframes that are DL in any of the three configurations are also DL in configuration 5. The UL subframes in configuration 5 are also UL subframes in configuration 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6.

Configuration Assignment

In Rel-8 TDD, the following two sets of subframe timings are set based on the same parameter, which is the serving cell U/D configuration number: (1) UL HARQ control and grant subframe timing, and (2) DL HARQ A/N subframe timing. In Rel-10 TDD CA, both types of subframe timings across all cells are set based on the same parameter, which is the PcellU/D configuration number.

To support carrier aggregation of TDD cells with different U/D configurations, the user equipment may be configured with the following two numbers according to the teaching of the example embodiments: (1) an UL control timing configuration number for setting UL HARQ and grant timings across all aggregated cells, and (2) a DL HARQ control timing configuration number for setting DL HARQ timings across all aggregated cells.

The UL control timing configuration number may be set to the configuration number of a configuration that may be connected from all aggregated configurations with upward arrows in the subframe timing compatibility hierarchy in FIG. 15. If more than one configuration number may be chosen, the chosen setting may be the configuration at the lowest level in the subframe timing compatibility hierarchy. The chosen setting may result in more DL subframes for PUSCH grant and A/N feedback. The following example cases are provided below for the purpose of explaining some of the example embodiments.

Example Case 1:

If cells with configuration 1 and 2 are aggregated, the UL control timing configuration number may be set to 1, 6 or 0. The chosen setting may be 1.

Example Case 2:

If cells with configuration 1 and 3 are aggregated, the UL control timing configuration number may be set to 6 or 0. The chosen setting may be 6, which is different than the U/D configuration numbers of the two TDD cells.

This UL control timing configuration number setting ensures identical PUSCH grant and PHICH timings across all CCs and DL subframes are available at these timings regardless of the Pcell configuration. That is, the PUSCH grant and PHICH subframes are never in subframes with conflicting U/D directions across different CCs. This setting further ensures all UL subframes from all aggregated CCs may be scheduled either in-CC or cross-CC.

The DL HARQ control timing configuration number may be set to the configuration number of a configuration that may be connected from all aggregated configurations with downward arrows in the subframe timing compatibility hierarchy in FIG. 15. If more than one configuration number may be chosen, the chosen setting may be that of the configuration at the highest level in the subframe timing compatibility hierarchy. The chosen setting may result in more UL subframes for PDSCH A/N feedback. The following example cases are provided below for the purpose of explaining some of the example embodiments.

Example Case 1:

If cells with configuration 1 and 2 are aggregated, the DL HARQ control timing configuration number may be set to 2 or 5. The chosen setting may be 2.

Example Case 2:

If cells with configuration 1 and 3 are aggregated, the DL HARQ control timing configuration number may be set to 4 or 5. The chosen setting may be 4, which is different than the U/D configuration numbers of the two TDD cells.

This DL HARQ control timing configuration number setting ensures identical PDSCH A/N feedback timings across all CCs and UL subframes are available at these timings regardless of the Pcell configuration.

Example Carrier Aggregation of Configuration 1 and 2 TDD Cells

To support the aggregation of configuration 1 and 2 TDD cells, the two HARQ control timing configuration numbers may be set as follows:

-   -   The UL control timing configuration number may be set to 1.     -   The DL HARQ control timing configuration number may be set to 2.

Note these configuration number settings are applicable regardless of which of the two TDD cells serves as the Pcell.

The PUSCH grant and A/N feedback timings for aggregation of a configuration 1 cell as Pcell and a configuration 2 cell as Scell are illustrated in FIG. 16. The PUSCH grant and A/N feedback timings for aggregation of a configuration 2 cell as Pcell and a configuration 1 cell as Scell are illustrated in FIG. 17. This analysis shows that all the UL subframes may be scheduled either from the Pcell (if cross-carrier scheduling is configured) or from the Scell itself (if cross-carrier scheduling is not configured). Furthermore, A/N feedback timings for all UL subframes are clearly assigned.

The PDSCH A/N feedback timings for aggregation of a configuration 1 cell and a configuration 2 cell is shown in FIG. 18. The analysis confirms that A/N feedbacks for all PDSCH in both the Pcell and the Scell are clearly assigned to suitable UL subframes on the Pcell.

Example Carrier Aggregation of Configuration 1 and 3 TDD Cells

To support the aggregation of configuration 1 and 3 TDD cells, the two HARQ control timing configuration numbers may be set as follows:

-   -   The UL control timing configuration number may be set to 6.     -   The DL HARQ control timing configuration number may be set to 4.

Note these configuration number settings are applicable regardless of which of the two TDD cells serves as the Pcell.

The PUSCH grant and A/N feedback timings (i.e., for uplink A/N feedback timing) for aggregation of a configuration 1 cell as Pcell and a configuration 3 cell as Scell are illustrated in FIG. 19. The PUSCH grant and A/N feedback timings for aggregation of a configuration 3 cell as Pcell and a configuration 1 cell as Scell are illustrated in FIG. 20. This analysis shows that all the UL subframes may be scheduled either from the Pcell (if cross-carrier scheduling is configured) or from the Scell itself (if cross-carrier scheduling is not configured). Furthermore, A/N feedback timings for all UL subframes are clearly assigned.

The PDSCH A/N feedback timings for aggregation of a configuration 1 cell and a configuration 3 cell is shown in FIG. 21. The analysis confirms that A/N feedbacks for all PDSCH in both the Pcell and the Scell are clearly assigned to suitable UL subframes on the Pcell.

Computation of the Subframe Timing Compatibility Based on Efficient Storage

As should be appreciated from above, according to some of the example embodiments, for a given set of aggregated TDD cells with different U/D configurations, the UL control and DL HARQ control timing configuration numbers may be set based on a systematic rule encoded in the subframe timing compatibility hierarchy, for example as illustrated in FIG. 15. The UL control and DL HARQ control timing configuration numbers so chosen may be different than any of the U/D configuration number of the aggregated cells.

The UL control timing configuration number may be set to the configuration number of a configuration that may be connected from all aggregated configurations with upward arrows in the subframe timing compatibility hierarchy in FIG. 15. If more than one configuration number may be chosen, a setting may be chosen to be the configuration at the lowest level in the subframe compatibility hierarchy. This setting results in more DL subframes for PUSCH grant and A/N feedback.

The DL HARQ control timing configuration number may be set to the configuration number of a configuration that may be connected from all aggregated configurations with downward arrows in the subframe timing compatibility hierarchy in FIG. 15. If more than one configuration number may be chosen, the setting may be chosen to be the configuration at the highest level in the subframe timing compatibility hierarchy. This setting results in more UL subframes for PDSCH A/N feedback.

Some of the example embodiments may also be directed towards efficient digital representation and storage methods of the subframe timing compatibility hierarchy. Some of the example embodiments may also be directed towards efficient computational methods and a corresponding apparatus for computing the UL control timing configuration number and the DL HARQ control timing configuration number.

According to some of the example embodiments, the subframe timing compatibility hierarchy may be represented with a table of sets. The UL control timing configuration number and the DL HARQ control timing configuration number may be computed with set intersection operations. If there is more than one control timing configuration number candidates after the set intersection operations, the network node may select a preferred control timing configuration number setting based on at least system loads and user equipment application needs.

An UL control timing configuration candidate set and a DL HARQ control timing configuration candidate set may be stored for each of the LTE cell U/D configurations. An example of the specific values of the candidate sets are shown in the table provided below.

TABLE 4 Control Timing Configuration Sets UL control timing DL HARQ control Component cell U/D configuration timing configuration configuration candidate set candidate set 0 {0} {0,6,1,3,2,4,5} 1 {1,6,0} {1,2,4,5} 2 {2,1,6,0} {2,5} 3 {3,6,0} {3,4,5} 4 {4,1,3,6,0} {4,5} 5 {5,2,4,1,3,6,0} {5} 6 {6,0} {6,1,3,2,4,5}

According to some of the example embodiments, for a given set of cell U/D configurations to be aggregated, the UL control timing configuration number may be set to a configuration number from the intersection of all UL control timing configuration candidate sets corresponding to the cell U/D configurations to be aggregated. The following example cases are provided below for the purpose of explaining some of the example embodiments.

Example Case 1:

If cells with configuration 1 and 2 are aggregated, the corresponding UL control timing configuration candidate sets may be {1,6,0} and {2,1,6,0}. The intersection of all these sets may be computed to be {1,6,0}. Therefore, the UL control timing configuration number may be set to 1, 6 or 0.

Example Case 2:

If cells with configuration 1 and 3 are aggregated, the corresponding UL control timing configuration candidate sets may be {1,6,0} and {3,6,0}. The intersection of all these set may be computed to be {6,0}. Therefore, the UL control timing configuration number may be set to 6 or 0.

Example Case 3:

If cells with configuration 1, 3 and 4 are aggregated, the corresponding UL control timing configuration candidate sets may be {1,6,0}, {3,6,0} and {4,1,3,6,0}. The intersection of all these set may be computed to be {6,0}. Therefore, the UL control timing configuration number may be set to 6 or 0.

According to some of the example embodiments, for a given set of cell U/D configurations to be aggregated, the DL HARQ control timing configuration number may be set to a configuration number from the intersection of all DL HARQ control timing configuration candidate sets corresponding to the cell U/D configurations to be aggregated. The following example cases are provided below for the purpose of explaining some of the example embodiments.

Example Case 1:

If cells with configuration 1 and 2 are aggregated, the corresponding DL HARQ control timing configuration candidate sets may be {1,2,4,5} and {2,5}. The intersection of all these sets may be computed to be {2,5}. Therefore, the DL HARQ control timing configuration number may be set to 2 or 5.

Example Case 2:

If cells with configuration 1 and 3 are aggregated, the corresponding DL HARQ control timing configuration candidate sets may be {1,2,4,5} and {3,4,5}. The intersection of all these sets may be computed to be {4,5}. Therefore, the DL HARQ control timing configuration number may be set to 4 or 5.

Example Case 3:

If cells with configuration 1, 3 and 4 are aggregated, the corresponding DL HARQ control timing configuration candidate sets may be {1,2,4,5}, {3,4,5} and {4,5}. The intersection of all of these sets may be computed to be {4,5}. Therefore, the DL HARQ control timing configuration number may be set to 4 or 5.

If there are more than one control timing configuration number candidates after the set intersection operations, the network node or user equipment may select and signal a preferred control timing configuration number setting based on at least system loads and user equipment application needs. Signaling of the control timing could for example be done with radio resource control (RRC) signaling.

It should also be appreciated that, according to some of the example embodiments, the subframe timing compatibility hierarchy may be represented with a table of ordered sets. The UL control timing configuration number and the DL HARQ control timing configuration number may be computed with set intersection operations while preserving the order of numbers within the set. The chosen control timing configuration number may be the first or last number after the set intersection operation.

An UL control timing configuration candidate set and a DL HARQ control timing configuration candidate set may be stored for each of the LTE cell U/D configurations. The specific values of the candidate or ordered sets are shown in table 4. The order of candidate configuration numbers in each of the candidate sets shown in the table may be preserved in storage.

For a given set of cell U/D configurations to be aggregated, the UL control timing configuration number may be set to a configuration number from the intersection of all UL control timing configuration candidate sets corresponding to the cell U/D configurations to be aggregated, where the set intersection operations preserve the ordering of numbers in the concerned sets. The following example cases are provided below for the purpose of explaining some of the example embodiments.

Example 1

If cells with configuration 1 and 2 are aggregated, the corresponding UL control timing configuration candidate or ordered sets may be {1,6,0} and {2,1,6,0}. The intersection of all these set may be computed to be {1,6,0}. Therefore, the chosen UL control timing configuration number may be 1.

Example 2

If cells with configuration 1 and 3 are aggregated, the corresponding UL control timing configuration candidate or ordered sets may be {1,6,0} and {3,6,0}. The intersection of all these set may be computed to be {6,0}. Therefore, the chosen UL control timing configuration number may be 6.

Example 3

If cells with configuration cells 1, 3 and 4 are aggregated, the corresponding UL control timing configuration candidate or ordered sets may be {1,6,0}, {3,6,0} and {4,1,3,6,0}. The intersection of all these set may be computed to be {6,0}. Therefore, the chosen UL control timing configuration number may be 6.

For a given set of cell U/D configurations to be aggregated, the DL HARQ control timing configuration number may be set to a configuration number from the intersection of all DL HARQ control timing configuration candidate sets corresponding to the cell U/D configurations to be aggregated, where the set intersection operations preserve the ordering of numbers in the concerned sets. The following example cases are provided below for the purpose of explaining some of the example embodiments.

Example 1

If cells with configuration 1 and 2 are aggregated, the corresponding DL HARQ control timing configuration candidate or ordered sets may be {1,2,4,5} and {2,5}. The intersection of all these set may be computed to be {2,5}. Therefore, the chosen DL HARQ control timing configuration number may be 2.

Example 2

If cells with configuration 1 and 3 are aggregated, the corresponding DL HARQ control timing configuration candidate or ordered sets may be {1,2,4,5} and {3,4,5}. The intersection of all these set may be computed to be {4,5}. Therefore, the chosen DL HARQ control timing configuration number may be 4.

Example 3

If cells with configuration 1, 3 and 4 are aggregated, the corresponding DL HARQ control timing configuration candidate sets may be {1,2,4,5}, {3,4,5} and {4,5}. The intersection of all these set may be computed to be {4,5}. Therefore, the chosen DL HARQ control timing configuration number may be 4.

Examples of Half-Duplex Configuration Assignment

A user equipment capable of only half-duplex operations may perform either transmission or reception in a subframe but not both actions. Therefore, according to some of the example embodiments, subframes without conflicting U/D directions may be scheduled with PDCCH transmitted in the same subframe time (in-subframe scheduling).

For subframes with conflicting U/D directions across CCs, the half-duplex user equipments need to be informed of the scheduled directions in advance. Forward-subframe UL scheduling is already used in LTE. However, additional forward-subframe DL scheduling PDCCHs may be needed.

According to the example embodiments, the following features are designed for the forward-subframe DL scheduling PDCCHs:

-   -   If no cross-CC scheduling is configured, additional         forward-subframe DL scheduling PDCCHs for the individual cells         may be added (referred to as in-CC forward-subframe DL         scheduling PDCCHs).     -   If cross-CC scheduling is configured, additional cross-CC         forward-subframe DL scheduling PDCCHs from the Pcell may be         added.     -   The forward-scheduling timing may be based on the UL grant         timing of the same target cell. Other forward-scheduling timing         methods may also be used.     -   The forward-subframe DL scheduling PDCCHs may be implemented         according to the teaching of flexible carrier indicator.

Example Carrier Aggregation of Configuration 1 and 2 TDD Cells:

To support the aggregation of configuration 1 and 2 TDD cells, the two HARQ control timing configuration numbers may be set as follows:

-   -   The UL control timing configuration number may be set to 1.     -   The DL HARQ control timing configuration number may be set to 2.

For subframes with conflicting U/D directions across CCs, the half-duplex user equipments need to be informed of the scheduled directions in advance. Additional forward-subframe DL scheduling PDCCHs based on UL grant timings may be introduced as follows:

-   -   If configuration 1 is a Pcell and cross-CC scheduling is         configured, two additional cross-CC forward-subframe DL         scheduling PDCCHs (from the configuration 1 cell) are shown in         FIG. 22.     -   If configuration 2 is a Pcell or if cross-CC scheduling is not         configured, two additional in-CC forward-subframe DL scheduling         PDCCHs (from the configuration 2 cell) are shown in FIG. 22.

Example Carrier Aggregation of Configuration 1 and 3 TDD Cells

To support the aggregation of configuration 1 and 3 TDD cells, the two HARQ control timing configuration numbers may be set as follows:

-   -   The UL control timing configuration number may be set to 6.     -   The DL HARQ control timing configuration number may be set to 4.

For subframes with conflicting U/D directions across CCs, the half-duplex UEs may need to be informed of the scheduled directions in advance. Additional forward-subframe DL scheduling PDCCHs based on UL grant timings may be introduced as follows:

-   -   If no cross-CC scheduling is configured, three in-CC         forward-subframe DL scheduling PDCCHs from the Pcell and Scell         may be added as shown in FIG. 23.     -   If cross-CC scheduling is configured, three cross-CC         forward-subframe DL scheduling PDCCHs from the Pcell may be         added as shown in FIG. 23.

Examples of Full-Duplex Configuration Assignment

A full-duplex user equipment may perform transmission and reception simultaneously in subframes with conflicting U/D directions across different CCs. According to the above teaching of the example embodiments, if cross-carrier scheduling is not configured, all DL subframes may be scheduled in-CC and in-subframe.

If cross-carrier scheduling is configured, in a subframe without conflicting directions, the DL subframes in the scheduling cell may carry the cross-carrier DL scheduling PDCCHs to schedule other DL subframes of the same subframe time on other cells. Furthermore, in a subframe with conflicting directions, if the scheduling cell is a DL subframe, PDCCH(s) may be sent from said subframe to schedule other DL subframes of the same subframe time on other cells. Additionally, in a subframe with conflicting directions, if the scheduling cell is an UL subframe, PDCCH(s) cannot be sent from said subframe to schedule other DL subframes of the same subframe time on other cells.

Thus, according to some of the example embodiments, cross-CC forward-subframe DL scheduling PDCCHs from the scheduling cell may be enabled. According to some of the example embodiments, the cross-CC forward-subframe DL scheduling PDCCHs designed in the example embodiments directed towards the half-duplex operations are applied to support full-duplex operations with certain cross-carrier scheduling scenarios.

Example Carrier Aggregation of Configuration 1 and 2 TDD Cells

To support the aggregation of configuration 1 and 2 TDD cells, the two HARQ control timing configuration numbers may be set as follows:

-   -   The UL control timing configuration number may be set to 1.     -   The DL HARQ control timing configuration number may be set to 2.

If configuration 2 is the Pcell, all DL subframes may be scheduled in-subframe and in-CC or cross-CC.

If configuration 1 is the Pcell, if cross-CC scheduling is not configured, all DL subframes may be scheduled in-CC and in-subframe. If cross-scheduling is configured, all DL subframes in the Scell may be CC-scheduled in subframe except subframes 3 and 8. Note these two subframes are the subframes with conflicting U/D directions. Hence, the half-duplex solution may be reused here. The two subframes are scheduled with forward-subframe scheduling PDCCH based on the UL grant timings of these two subframes. The two additional cross-CC forward-subframe DL scheduling PDCCHs are shown in FIG. 24.

Example Carrier Aggregation of Configuration 1 and 3 TDD Cells

To support the aggregation of configuration 1 and 3 TDD cells, the two HARQ control timing configuration numbers may be set as follows:

-   -   The UL control timing configuration number may be set to 6.     -   The DL HARQ control timing configuration number may be set to 4.

If cross-CC scheduling is not configured, all DL subframes may be scheduled in-CC and in-subframe. If cross-scheduling is configured, all DL subframes in the Scell may be CC-scheduled in-subframe except subframes 7 and 8 in configuration 3 cannot be cross-scheduled in-subframe if configuration 1 is the Pcell. Additionally, subframe 4 cannot be cross-scheduled in-subframe if configuration 3 is the Pcell.

Using the half-duplex solution from the example embodiments directed towards half-duplex scheduling, two (if configuration 1 is the Pcell) or one (if configuration 3 is the Pcell) additional cross-CC forward-subframe DL scheduling PDCCHs based on the corresponding UL grant timings are used as shown in FIG. 25.

Examples of Forward Downlink Scheduling

The forward-subframe DL scheduling PDCCHs introduced in the example embodiments directed to half and full duplex assignment are new features and may require implementation complexity to integrate into existing network node hardware and software architecture. There is hence a benefit in reducing the need to rely on such new forward-subframe DL scheduling PDCCHs.

According to some of the example embodiments, the following two operation rules may be implemented on the user equipment for a subframe with conflicting directions across the aggregated CCs:

In full-duplex operations, a user equipment may monitor PDCCH(s) in scheduling CC(s) with the DL direction (even if the user equipment has been given in advance grant(s) to transmit in CC(s) with the UL direction).

In half-duplex operations, a user equipment may monitor PDCCH(s) in scheduling CC(s) with the DL direction if the user equipment has not been given in advance any grant to transmit in any CC with the UL direction.

Example Network Node Configuration

FIG. 26 illustrates an example of a network node 400 which may incorporate some of the example embodiments discussed above. According to some of the example embodiments, the network node may be a base station, a user equipment or a relay node. As shown in FIG. 26, node 400 may comprise a receiver 407 and transmitter 408 units configured to receive and transmit, respectively, any form of communications or control signals within a network. It should be appreciated that the receiver 407 and transmitter 408 units may be comprised as a single transceiving unit or transceiver circuitry. It should further be appreciated that the receiver 407 and transmitter 408 units, or transceiving unit, may be in the form of any input/output communications port known in the art.

The network node 400 may further comprise at least one memory unit 409 that may be in communication with the receiver 407 and transmitter 408 units. The memory unit 409 may be configured to store received or transmitted data and/or executable program instructions. The memory unit 409 may also be configured to store the timing compatibility hierarchy and/or control timing configuration candidate or ordered sets. The memory unit 409 may be any suitable type of computer readable memory and may be of volatile and/or non-volatile type.

The node 400 may further comprise an analyzing unit 413 which is configured to analyze and determine a control timing configuration number or setting for UL and DL communications. The node further comprises an establishment unit 415 which is configured to assign the control timing configuration number or setting for UL and DL communications to a user equipment. The node 400 may further comprise an arrangement unit 411 that may be configured to arrange the timing configurations in a hierarchical structure or provide and/or order the candidate or ordered sets.

The determining unit, assigning unit, and/or the arrangement unit may be any suitable type of computation unit, e.g. a microprocessor, digital signal processor (DSP), field programmable gate array (FPGA), or application specific integrated circuit (ASIC). It should be appreciated that the determining unit, assigning unit, and/or the arrangement unit may be comprised as a single unit or any number of units.

FIG. 27 is a flow diagram depicting example operations which may be taken by the network node 400 for determining at least one timing configuration number for a plurality of aggregated cells of a multiple cell communications network. Each aggregated cell is associated with an uplink-downlink configuration number, where at least two uplink-downlink configuration numbers of the plurality of aggregated cells are not equal. The aggregated cells are associated with a user equipment in the multiple cell communications network.

Example Operation 10:

The network node 400 is configured to analyze 10 at least two ordered sets of timing configuration numbers. Each of the ordered set corresponds to a respective cell associated with the user equipment in the multiple cell communications network. The analyzing unit 413 is configured to perform the analyzing 10.

Example Operation 11:

According to some of the example embodiments, the analyzing 10 may further comprise reading 11 each ordered set of timing configuration numbers from memory 409. The analyzing unit 413 may be configured to perform the reading 11.

Example Operation 12:

According to some of the example embodiments, the reading 11 may further comprise using 12 each of the uplink-downlink configuration numbers of the corresponding cells associated with the user equipment as an index to access the memory 409. The analyzing unit 413 may be configured to perform the using 12.

Example Operation 13:

According to some of the example embodiments, the analyzing 10 may further comprise arranging 13 the timing configuration numbers in each respective ordered set based on a subframe timing compatibility, for example, as described in relation to FIG. 15. The arrangement unit 411 may be configured to perform the arranging 13.

Example Operation 14:

According to some of the example embodiments, the arranging 13 may also comprise arranging 14 respective timing configuration numbers for uplink control timing such that timing configuration numbers which appear later or earlier in the ordered set correspond to uplink-downlink configurations which comprise uplink subframes that form a superset of all uplink subframes from uplink-downlink configurations associated with timing configuration numbers which appear earlier or later, respectively, in the ordered set. The arrangement unit 411 may be configured to perform of arranging 14. It should also be appreciated that the subframe timing compatibility may be prearranged by another means.

It should be appreciated that each ordered set may comprise one timing configuration number that is equal to the uplink-downlink configuration number of the corresponding cell. It should also be appreciated that each ordered set may further comprise one timing configuration number that is equal to the uplink-downlink configuration number of the corresponding cell as a first or last timing configuration number.

Example Operation 16:

According to some of the example embodiments, the arranging 13 may also comprise arranging 16 respective timing configuration numbers for downlink HARQ control timing such that timing configuration numbers which appear later or earlier in the ordered set correspond to uplink-downlink configurations which comprise downlink subframes that form a superset of all downlink subframes from uplink-downlink configurations associated with timing configurations numbers which appear earlier or later, respectively, in the ordered set. The arrangement unit 411 may be configured to perform of arranging 16. It should also be appreciated that the subframe timing compatibility may be prearranged by another means.

It should be appreciated that each ordered set may comprise one timing configuration number that is equal to the uplink-downlink configuration number of the corresponding cell. It should also be appreciated that each ordered set may further comprise one timing configuration number that is equal to the uplink-downlink configuration number of the corresponding cell as a first or last timing configuration number.

Example Operation 18:

The node 400 is configured to assign 18 at least one timing configuration number from the at least two ordered sets of timing configuration numbers. According to an example of embodiments, the assigning 18 is based on a result from the analyzing 10, e.g. as disclosed earlier in relation to Table 4 and the examples referring to Table 4. The establishment unit 415 is configured to perform the assigning 18. The assigning may also further be based on results from any of the preceding operations 11, 12, 13, 14, and 16.

It should be appreciated that the at least one timing configuration number may be indicative of an uplink control timing configuration number for establishing uplink scheduling grant and/or acknowledgement/negative-acknowledgement, A/N, timings across all aggregated cells associated with the user equipment. It should also be appreciated that the at least one timing configuration number may be indicative of a downlink Hybrid-Automatic Repeat Request, HARQ, control timing for establishing downlink HARQ A/N timings across all aggregated cells associated with the use equipment.

According to embodiments the timing configuration numbers may be seen as control timing configuration number used to set subframe timing. The assigning 18 may further be seen as assigning 18 at least one control timing configuration number from said at least two ordered sets of control timing configuration numbers as a common control timing configuration number for each of the plurality of aggregated cells of the multiple cells communications network. Basically, assigning is done for a common control timing configuration number which will be suitable for all of the cells.

Example Operation 20:

According to some of the example embodiments, the assigning 18 further comprise assigning 20 the timing configuration number based on an intersection of the at least two ordered sets of timing configuration numbers. The establishment unit 415 may be configured to perform the assigning 20.

Example Operation 22:

According to some of the example embodiments, the assigning 20 further comprise assigning 22 a first or last timing configuration number in the intersection. For example, the intersection may also be ordered, thus the assignment may be made with respect to the first or last timing configuration number, as explained, e.g., in relation to table 4 and the example provided thereafter. The establishment unit 415 may be configured to perform the assigning 22.

CONCLUSION

The description of the example embodiments provided herein have been presented for purposes of illustration. The description is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit example embodiments to the precise form disclosed, and modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings or may be acquired from practice of various alternatives to the provided embodiments. The examples discussed herein were chosen and described in order to explain the principles and the nature of various example embodiments and its practical application to enable one skilled in the art to utilize the example embodiments in various manners and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. The features of the embodiments described herein may be combined in all possible combinations of methods, apparatus, modules, systems, and computer program products. It should be appreciated that the example embodiments presented herein may be practiced in any combination with each other.

It should be noted that the word “comprising” does not necessarily exclude the presence of other elements or steps than those listed and the words “a” or “an” preceding an element do not exclude the presence of a plurality of such elements. It should further be noted that any reference signs do not limit the scope of the claims, that the example embodiments may be implemented at least in part by means of both hardware and software, and that several “means”, “units” or “devices” may be represented by the same item of hardware and/or circuits/circuitries.

A “device” as the term is used herein, is to be broadly interpreted to include a radiotelephone having ability for Internet/intranet access, web browser, organizer, calendar, a camera (e.g., video and/or still image camera), a sound recorder (e.g., a microphone), and/or global positioning system (GPS) receiver; a personal communications system (PCS) user equipment that may combine a cellular radiotelephone with data processing; a personal digital assistant (PDA) that may include a radiotelephone or wireless communication system; a laptop; a camera (e.g., video and/or still image camera) having communication ability; and any other computation or communication device capable of transceiving, such as a personal computer, a home entertainment system, a television, etc.

Although the description is mainly given for a user equipment, as measuring or recording unit, it should be understood by the skilled in the art that “user equipment” is a non-limiting term which means any wireless device, terminal, or node capable of receiving in DL and transmitting in UL (e.g. PDA, laptop, mobile, sensor, fixed relay, mobile relay or even a radio base station, e.g. femto base station).

A cell is associated with a radio node, where a radio node or radio network node or eNodeB used interchangeably in the example embodiment description, comprises in a general sense any node transmitting radio signals used for measurements, e.g., eNodeB, macro/micro/pico base station, home eNodeB, relay, beacon device, or repeater. A radio node herein may comprise a radio node operating in one or more frequencies or frequency bands. It may be a radio node capable of CA. It may also be a single- or multi-RAT node. A multi-RAT node may comprise a node with co-located RATs or supporting multi-standard radio (MSR) or a mixed radio node.

The various example embodiments described herein are described in the general context of method steps or processes, which may be implemented in one aspect by a computer program product, embodied in a computer-readable medium, including computer-executable instructions, such as program code, executed by computers in networked environments. A computer-readable medium may include removable and non-removable storage devices including, but not limited to, Read Only Memory (ROM), Random Access Memory (RAM), compact discs (CDs), digital versatile discs (DVD), etc. Generally, program modules may include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Computer-executable instructions, associated data structures, and program modules represent examples of program code for executing steps of the methods disclosed herein. The particular sequence of such executable instructions or associated data structures represents examples of corresponding acts for implementing the functions described in such steps or processes.

In the drawings and specification, there have been disclosed exemplary embodiments. However, many variations and modifications may be made to these embodiments. Accordingly, although specific terms are employed, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the embodiments being defined by the following claims. 

1-26. (canceled)
 27. A method, in a network node, for determining at least one timing configuration number for a plurality of aggregated cells of a multiple cell communications network, each aggregated cell being associated with an uplink-downlink configuration number, wherein at least two uplink-downlink configuration numbers of the plurality of aggregated cells are not equal, and said plurality of aggregated cells being associated with a user equipment, the method comprising: analysing at least two ordered sets of timing configuration numbers, each ordered set corresponding to a respective cell associated with the user equipment in the multiple cell communications network; and assigning at least one timing configuration number from said at least two ordered sets of timing configuration numbers.
 28. The method of claim 27, wherein the at least one timing configuration number is indicative of a downlink Hybrid-Automatic Repeat Request, HARQ, control timing configuration for establishing downlink HARQ A/N timings across the plurality of aggregated cells.
 29. The method of claim 27, wherein the at least one timing configuration number is indicative of an uplink control timing configuration number for establishing at least one or uplink scheduling grant and acknowledgement/negative-acknowledgement, A/N, timings across the plurality of aggregated cells.
 30. The method of claim 27, wherein the analysing further comprises reading each ordered set of timing configuration numbers from memory.
 31. The method of claim 30, wherein the reading further comprises using each of the uplink-downlink configuration numbers of the corresponding cells associated with the user equipment as an index to access the memory.
 32. The method of claim 27, wherein the analysing further comprises arranging the timing configuration numbers in each respective ordered set based on a subframe timing compatibility.
 33. The method of claim 32, wherein the arranging further comprises arranging respective timing configuration numbers for uplink control timing such that timing configuration numbers which appear later or earlier in the ordered set correspond to uplink-downlink configurations which comprise uplink subframes that form a superset of all uplink subframes from uplink-downlink configuration associated with timing configuration numbers which appear earlier or later, respectively, in the ordered set.
 34. The method of claim 32, wherein the arranging further comprises arranging respective timing configuration numbers for downlink HARQ control timing such that timing configuration numbers which appear later or earlier in the ordered set correspond to uplink-downlink configurations which comprise downlink subframes that form a superset of all downlink subframes from uplink-downlink configurations associated with timing configuration numbers which appear earlier or later, respectively, in the ordered set.
 35. The method of claim 27, wherein each order set comprises one timing configuration number that is equal to the uplink-downlink configuration number of said corresponding cell.
 36. The method of claim 35, wherein each order set further comprises one timing configuration number that is equal to the uplink-downlink configuration number of said corresponding cell as the first or last, respectively, timing configuration number in the ordered set.
 37. The method of claim 27, wherein the assigning further comprises assigning the at least one timing configuration number based on an intersection of said at least two ordered sets of timing configuration numbers.
 38. The method of claim 37, wherein the assigning further comprises assigning a first or a last timing configuration number in the intersection.
 39. A network node for determining at least one timing configuration number for a plurality of aggregated cells of a multiple cell communications network, each aggregated cell being associated with an uplink-downlink configuration number, wherein at least two uplink-downlink configuration numbers of the plurality of aggregated cells are not equal, and said plurality of aggregated cells being associated with a user equipment, the network node comprising: an analysing unit configured to analyse at least two ordered sets of timing configuration numbers, each ordered set corresponding to a cell associated with the user equipment in the multiple cell communications network; and an establishment unit configured to assign at least one timing configuration number from said at least two ordered sets of timing configuration numbers.
 40. The network node of claim 39, wherein the network node is one of the user equipment, a base station, and a relay node.
 41. The network node of claim 39, wherein the at least one timing configuration number is indicative of a downlink Hybrid-Automatic Repeat Request, HARQ, control timing configuration for establishing downlink HARQ A/N timings across the plurality of aggregated cells.
 42. The network node of claim 39, wherein the at least one timing configuration number is indicative of at least one of an uplink control timing configuration number for establishing uplink scheduling grant and acknowledgement/negative-acknowledgement, A/N, timings across the plurality of aggregated cells.
 43. The network node of claim 39, wherein the analysing unit is further configured to read each ordered set of timing configuration numbers from memory.
 44. The network node of claim 43, wherein the analysing unit is further configured to utilize each of the uplink-downlink configuration numbers of the corresponding cells associated with the user equipment as an index to access the memory.
 45. The network node of claim 39, further comprising an arrangement unit configured to arrange the timing configuration numbers in each respective ordered set based on a subframe timing compatibility.
 46. The network node of claim 45, wherein the arrangement unit is further configured to arrange respective timing configuration numbers for uplink control timing such that timing configuration numbers which appear later or earlier in the ordered set correspond to uplink-downlink configurations which comprise uplink subframes that form a superset of all uplink subframes from uplink-downlink configuration associated with timing configuration numbers which appear earlier or later, respectively, in the ordered set.
 47. The network node of claim 45, wherein the arrangement unit is further configured to arrange respective timing configuration numbers for downlink HARQ control timing such that timing configuration numbers which appear later or earlier in the ordered set correspond to uplink-downlink configurations which comprise downlink subframes that form a superset of all downlink subframes from uplink-downlink configurations associated with timing configuration numbers which appear earlier or later, respectively, in the ordered set.
 48. The network node of claim 39, wherein each order set comprises one timing configuration number that is equal to the uplink-downlink configuration number of said corresponding cell.
 49. The network node of claim 48, wherein each order set further comprises one timing configuration number that is equal to the uplink-downlink configuration number of said corresponding cell as the first or last, respectively, timing configuration number in the ordered set.
 50. The network node of claim 39, wherein the establishment unit is further configured to assign the at least one timing configuration number based on an intersection of said at least two ordered sets of timing configuration numbers.
 51. The network node of claim 50, wherein the establishment unit is further configured to assign a first or a last timing configuration number in the intersection.
 52. A computer program product stored in a non-transitory computer readable medium for controlling a network node that determines at least one timing configuration number for a plurality of aggregated cells of a multiple cell communications network, each aggregated cell being associated with an uplink-downlink configuration number, wherein at least two uplink-downlink configuration numbers of the plurality of aggregated cells are not equal, and said plurality of aggregated cells being associated with a user equipment, the computer program product comprising software instructions which, when run on the network node, causes the network node to: analyze at least two ordered sets of timing configuration numbers, each ordered set corresponding to a respective cell associated with the user equipment in the multiple cell communications network; and assign at least one timing configuration number from said at least two ordered sets of timing configuration numbers. 